Not sure I'd call this music as such, but it had a certain engaging quality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8v-uDhcDyg
Not sure I'd call this music as such, but it had a certain engaging quality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8v-uDhcDyg
Now that is different.. rather unusual for sure and I am sure alot of wrok top get in synec.
" The essance of reproduction,to feel and re-create that which was felt and impared by the creater,does not exclude- within natural limitations-the assertion of creative power" - Dr. Hugo Goldschmidt.
I wish you the Best for each day, now and always.
Bill
I would say somebody had too much time on their hands![]()
I am with Mike on this one, interesting but not for me.
Margaret
One would like to hope that they are all "counting" together. But I agree, it seems somewhat useless. How about a concert for ten ripsaws?
Ten ripsaws? now that would be an unusual one.
Margaret
Actually, I agree, total b.s. but then again they said the same thing about that famous piece of silence, didn't they?
The video featured is actually not how the work was intended to be executed. Ligetti stipulates that the ten groups of ten metronomes be placed around the performance venue ... sigh. Whatever ...
I'm not an atheist and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many different languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.
—Albert Einstein.
Here's the score:
http://www.artnotart.com/fluxus/glig...mphonique.html
And here's a more authentic performance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-mEKnWU19s
An Australian performance, at that, some guy, thanks for sharing. I'll think I'll go and move a pile of sand with a pair of tweezers (makes as much sense as watch X metronomes ticking away).
But Contra, don't you like music? Besides, I thought you started this thread with "it has a certain engaging quality." Not that moving sand with tweezers couldn't also have a certain engaging quality. I mean, if you're into that type of thing!
It engaged itself with me by stealth and deception, I then found out its true, repetative motives. Give me 4'33" anyday.
Well, what can I say, such a genius to compose this and so well played
a true representation of some of today's music, unbelievable.
^ Not sure how well it represents today's music, as it was composed in 1962. Although I guess one could argue that in terms of classical music, 1962 wasn't that long ago (relatively speaking.)
''Music, I feel, should be emotional first and intellectual second.'' - Maurice Ravel
''The greatest education in the world is watching the masters at work.'' - Michael Jackson
tick, tick, tick, tick ...
there, now THERE's my original composition, just waiting for someone to play it for me please, with expression.