Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hammond setting translation

  1. #1
    Seaman, Mezzoforte
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    19

    Hammond setting translation

    In so much organ music there are Hammond organ settings that look very precise, but I have no way to decipher them. Is there a way to translate them into "real" registrations -- e.g. names of stops like "Diapason 8'"?

  2. #2
    Mat
    Mat is offline
    Vice Admiral Virtuoso Mat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,122
    This article might help you sort it out.

  3. #3
    Rear Admiral Appassionata wljmrbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Taylors, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,847
    there are also books on the hammond registratiions. Basically you are dealing with 16',8',4',2' (+ mutation ability- so to speak ) to create sounds by pulling the bars to create the level ( depth) of the sound that you desire. here are a few that may help you:

    Oboe 8' = 20 3675 210 20 8071 432 00 8533 330
    Flute 8' = 00 7714 000 00 2650 232
    String 8' = 00 1233 330 00 1110 000 (light string ) 00 5433 320
    Gamba 8" = 00 4400 110 00 8876 643
    Voix Celeste 8'/ Salicional 8' 00 3333 330
    Full 8',4' = 20 8876 543 22 8876 654

    If you notice as you pull thses stops that there is a shape pattern when all drawbars are pulled......... this gives you the basic config. for various sounds as you note above....... Experiment is many times a good way to develope registrations with the drawbar system..WRITE THEM DOWN WHEN YOU FIND ONES YOU LIKE....
    " The essance of reproduction,to feel and re-create that which was felt and impared by the creater,does not exclude- within natural limitations-the assertion of creative power" - Dr. Hugo Goldschmidt.

    I wish you the Best for each day, now and always.

    Bill

  4. #4
    Commodore con Forza
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    512
    All the explanation of Hammond drawbars ever written will never make a Hammond sound like a pipe organ. Was it ever intended to?

    Although Hammonds are no longer made, their debut back in the 1930's was the first attempt to substitute something electronic for the real thing - reed organs excepted, of course, and they were hardly electronic. There were later tries -- Wurlitzer, Baldwin, Conn, etc., but by now most of those are probably memories.

    In more recent times, Allen and Rodgers come about the closest to pipe organ sound -- the result of technology and research. Their main advantage is that they are cheaper than the real thing.

Similar Threads

  1. tiosd (translation: why can't I delete a post?)
    By JHC in forum Help, Troubleshooting & Site Feedback
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Nov-12-2010, 14:22
  2. Translation please
    By Contratrombone64 in forum Pipe Organ Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: Jun-29-2010, 00:02
  3. Mass Setting
    By Contratrombone64 in forum Pipe Organ Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Aug-05-2008, 04:11
  4. help with setting combination memory
    By gebbytoo in forum Pipe Organ Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Jul-22-2008, 19:43
  5. Translation
    By grand choeur in forum Pipe Organ Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Aug-22-2006, 22:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •