I'm not sure I like this idea

Krummhorn

Administrator
Staff member
ADMINISTRATOR
We already have this capability in the world ... it's called a "Bus" ... it transports 54 people 'in unison' while the passengers can read, do their nails, work on their laptop or just view the scenery, and far far cheaper per mile than 54 cars rolling along together, too. :rolleyes:

This new technology may work on the open highways, but let's see it go through a roundabout in busy London or see what happens when one (or more) of the "wirelessly connected" cars gets stopped for a traffic signal, etc. We have moronic traffic signals here that only allow two cars to go through on a green before it changes to red, and then there is a 90 second wait for another green ... meanwhile the "wireless caravan" can be several miles ahead somewhere.

And just 19' between each car? That's very unsafe and doesn't allow for a good safety margin ... and what happens if this 'caravan' of multiple cars approaches a very slow moving lorry going uphill, and there is only room enough for one car to pass it at one time?

Too many questions - too many possibilities haven't been answered yet in their study. Besides, the car is for individual and family travel - not another place to surf the internet and read books - we can do that at home - or take a train or a bus.

My kroners worth, anyway.
 

teddy

Duckmeister
I was qualified to teach to advanced levels and know that it is possible to train a good percentage of the population to at least Institute of Advanced Motorists levels, which should be the minimum for any driver with say, three years experience. A lot of it is mind set. The problem is getting people to pay for the training although quite a few companies are now realising it can save them money in the long term. Road trains are all very well but what happens when you get to a junction. Do you hold everyone else up while you wait for a really big gap in the traffic. They would quite possibly work well on motorways but probably nowhere else. As far as the software is concerned, is there a delay in the instructions to the following cars so they don't all start turning at the same time, with an "artic" effect, the last vehicle cutting the corner badly.

teddy
 

Dorsetmike

Member
Traffic signalling technology since the 1970s or before could cope with that, each vehicle could have a transponder which could delay the change to red, last vehicle could transmit a different code which defines it as end of convoy. I'd be more worried about an emergency vehicle override occurring half way through a convoy.

I can only see it being successful on motorways or out of town dual carriageways reconfigured with a dedicated lane in each direction for the convoys. Better still a separate road for them, however as the UK has no space for new roads we won't see any here!
 

teddy

Duckmeister
Then it will send a message to the rest of the vehicles to crash. Seriously this is where the small distance between the vehicles would cause trouble.

teddy
 

JHC

Chief assistant to the assistant chief
Then it will send a message to the rest of the vehicles to crash. Seriously this is where the small distance between the vehicles would cause trouble.

teddy
This would be an ideal way of deleting certain people ... I know let us program the first car to crash then choose the occupants for the next 5 cars only one person per car, now any suggestions?:grin:
 

JHC

Chief assistant to the assistant chief
You surprise me I thought Politicians would fill a 100 cars
 

marval

New member
I agree with Lars, a daft and dangerous idea. I would not feel relaxed with no control. If there were many of them on the road, all sorts could happen. Now I am 61 my local council will allow me a free bus pass, I think I will stay with that idea.
 

JHC

Chief assistant to the assistant chief
I also have a free bus pass but we don't have any buses where I live??




I don’t want a signature any more
:p
 

teddy

Duckmeister
Is the ideal in principle so different from the road trains they use in Australia? What is the accident rate with them, and where are they primarily used? Maybe the idea is usable on motorways where vehicles could join and leave at their convienience. On a long trip (such as the South of France) it might be a boon. Is the ideal, once perfected, and more dangerous than these bullet trains which travel at 10 billion MPH, or whtever it is.

teddy
 

teddy

Duckmeister
Is the ideal in principle so different from the road trains they use in Australia? What is the accident rate with them, and where are they primarily used? Maybe the idea is usable on motorways where vehicles could join and leave at their convienience. On a long trip (such as the South of France) it might be a boon. Is the ideal, once perfected, and more dangerous than these bullet trains which travel at 10 billion MPH, or whtever it is.

teddy
 

Dorsetmike

Member
Look Teddy, we know you're out to increase your post count but this is a bit obvious

whistling.gif
 
Top