@ Lars
I don't have anything against using general/divisonal pistons or having some type of sequencer. Both have advantages and disadvantages. I would say that finding organs here that have this functionality is getting more common, but I certainly don't expect to find it on instruments. While I know some people oppose the device all together, I think that the bigger reason more of them don't exist is that even if organists wanted a sequencer to be added to existing organs, they might not be able to get funds from their church to support making the change.
For the terminology, I was merely suggesting what I thought might be best. I'd be happy to hear from others also about what they think would be best. I know the word "sequencer" has a meaning in the MIDI world also so maybe that isn't best. I don't know. I (personally) haven't heard the terms adjustable or free combination, but that's probably just me. I have heard "(solid state) capture system" used, but it seems to me that this could be a name for any solid state combination system and not necessarily one that allows for combinations to be programmed and stepped through in sequence.
@'e'
I understand the trouble with importing/exporting .cmb files and agree with your conclusion that the feature request should actually be for multiple "banks" as you suggested. I also think that this could be accomplished through modifications to the Setter panel and I understand your reasoning for wanting to keep the current functionality of generals and divisionals the same.
I might suggest that for the Setter panel, maybe having Combinations 1-30 (which is the number of generals provided by the generals panel) to keep things consistent. Buttons for Next/Previous bank would then make more sense than the +/-10, +/-100 buttons. Maybe instead, buttons for Next/Previous, +/- Bank, +/-, 10 Banks might be better and serve the same purpose. Thoughts? Would it cause a problem that 1000 (the number of settings the setter will currently store) is not divisible by 30? As far as a standard for sending text to MIDI displays, I don't know about that, but displaying the current bank would be helpful if the setter was changed to function this way.
Regarding +/- buttons not recalling anything, I went back to my console and tested this again using revisions 1026 and 1125 and found that in both revisions the +/-10 buttons and the +/-1 buttons did recall the information stored to the next setting. For example, pressing __3 to select setting 003 recalls those settings, then pressing +10 immediately recalls the settings for 013. I don't know if this is something that's only happening on my system or if other people can confirm this. If the setter panel was to work like having multiple banks, the "next bank" and "previous bank" buttons shouldn't recall settings.
Also (as a side note), is ASIO4ALL supported in revision 1125? It works great in 1026 (which is the only reason I'm keeping it around). In 1125, the bars move showing that GrandOrgue is producing sound output, but nothing is audible when ASIO4ALL outputs are selected.