• Welcome to the Pipe Organ Forum! This is a part of the open community Magle International Music Forums focused on pipe organs (also known as "church organs"), organists, organ music and related topics.

    This forum is intended to be a friendly place where technically advanced organists and beginners (or even non-organists) can feel comfortable having discussions and asking questions. We learn by reading and asking questions, and it is hoped that the beginners (or non-organists) will feel free to ask even the simplest questions, and that the more advanced organists will patiently answer these questions. On the other hand, we encourage complex, technical discussions of technique, music, organ-building, etc. The opinions and observations of a diverse group of people from around the world should prove to be interesting and stimulating to all of us.

    As pipe organ discussions can sometimes become lively, it should be pointed out that this is an open forum. Statements made here are the opinion of the poster, and not necessarily that of the forum itself, its administrator, or its moderators.

    In order to post a new topic - or reply to existing ones - you may join and become a member by clicking on Register New User. It's completely free and only requires a working email address (in order to confirm your registration - it will never be given away!). We strive to make this a friendly and informative forum for anyone interested in pipe organs and organ music.

    (Note: If you wish to link to and promote your own website please read this thread first.)

    Many kind regards
    smile.gif

    Frederik Magle
    Administrator

    Krummhorn
    Co-Administrator

Mega-Hyper-Ultra Organ...

acc

Member
In all fairness, it should be pointed that the pedal division in St-Sulpice is indeed too small (which motivated the addition of two pedal stops in 1934, as a “good bye gift” to Widor). But Cavaillé-Coll had no choice, because he had to cope with the space limitations provided by the existing case.
 

dll927

New member
It has been said that Widor himself called the pedal division "inadequate", or however you say that in French.

You mention the Skinner organs. Much ink has been spilled over how "tastes" have changed in regard to stops and voicing. But Ernie seems to have known what he was doing. The original organ at L.A. First Congregational is a Skinner, although it has been consderably added to. One of the 32's on it is called a "Waldhorn".

The story behind "Erzahler" is that Skinner had a German worker in the factory. They came up with pipes with this sort-of new sound, and when they asked the German how it sounded, his reply was "Erzahler". I'm not sure anybody else knows what the word means.

Yes, I know "Erzahler" is supposed to have an umlaut (diaresis) over the "a", but my computer doesn't speak German except in the word processor, where you can add such things as umlauts, accent marks, etc., known collectively as diacritical marks.

Schoenstein did the one in the new LDS Conference Center, a.k.a. Hinckley's Palace, and also the one at First-Plymouth in Lincoln, NE. That one has quite a website describing the various organs the church has had.
 
Last edited:

Corno Dolce

Admiral Honkenwheezenpooferspieler
Aloha acc,

Indeed! Thanx for sharing. I've always wondered if the addition of those two pedal stops were not really an answer to Widor having once *semi-publically* commiserated that he wished for some *extra material* in the pedal division, and word of that revelation reached the ears of *some* benevolently disposed people in the curia of St. Sulpice, and the rest is, well, history.

Cheerio,

CD :):):)
 

acc

Member
OK, let's go for some small-talk:cool:: actually, legend has it that when Widor resigned from St-Sulpice, he told the curia how much he would have liked to pay for those two extra stops, as a gift to the parish at which he officiated for so long. The curia then allegedly “turned the tables on Widor” and decided to “offer” the stops to him.
 

dll927

New member
He resigned??? Retired??? He was about 26 when he started, and +63 years comes to right at 90.

Supposedly, the story is that several 'bigwigs' recommended him at that tender age, so he was hired, if that's the word, for a year. Hah!! Apparently after the year was up the organ was still sounding, so they left well enough alone. He must have outlasted several priests.

It's said that he thought too many other organists played the famous Toccata too fast. I wonder if he ever had the chance to play an electric-action instrument.

There is a guy at a small (Christian Science) college in the midwest, John Near, who has really delved into studying Widor's music, its various publications, and Widor's own changes that he made over time. As always, such an endeavor is likely to produce results, such as some "authentic" version, that will be as controversial as accurate.
 

acc

Member
He resigned??? Retired??? He was about 26 when he started, and +63 years comes to right at 90.

You're right: “retired” is probably more appropriate. :cheers:

Supposedly, the story is that several 'bigwigs' recommended him at that tender age, so he was hired, if that's the word, for a year. Hah!! Apparently after the year was up the organ was still sounding, so they left well enough alone. He must have outlasted several priests.

Indeed, the story of Widor's appointment, as told by himself in 1934 after his retirement, goes as follows: when Lefébure-Wély died in 1869, it was essentially Cavaillé-Coll who used his influence to secure the position at St-Sulpice for his young protégé Widor. This caused an upcry in some circles, complaining about such a young man being appointed to such a prestigious position (to which the great César Franck himself had applied). The clergy of St-Sulpice tried to be diplomatic and decided to appoint Widor on a temporary basis, for one year, starting in January 1870. But then, the Franco-Prussian war broke out, and people had other things on their minds then the status of Widor's appointment. In January 1871, when Widor paid a visit to the clergy to wish them a happy new year, they didn't mention the matter, so Widor thought it wise not to mention it either. And the old man to conclude that he had been on a temporary appointment for... 64 years! :lol:

It's said that he thought too many other organists played the famous Toccata too fast.

Actually, his views on speed actually changed over time: the 1887 edition is marked crotchet=118, but he reduced that to crotchet=100 in later editions.

But it is true that he often complained about it: “steam and electricty have changed the world, all goes faster today”. He also cited great musicians he knew in his youth, such as Liszt, who according to him did not play fast(!).

I wonder if he ever had the chance to play an electric-action instrument.

Most certainly yes: already in the 1890s, electrical actions were not unheard of in France (for example, the 1891 Merklin organ in Valenciennes still exists today, with its original electrical action). Moreover, Widor is on record stating that mechanical action with Barker levers remained the best action despite the developments allowed by electricity.

There is a guy at a small (Christian Science) college in the midwest, John Near, who has really delved into studying Widor's music, its various publications, and Widor's own changes that he made over time. As always, such an endeavor is likely to produce results, such as some "authentic" version, that will be as controversial as accurate.

Indeed: John Near has written a Ph.D. thesis on Widor in 1985, and he has subsequently published a new critical edition of all ten organ symphonies for A-R editions. I've used his edition to work on the Symphonie Romane, and highly recommend it! :up:
 

dll927

New member
That whole discussion of publishing problems and Widor's changes is interesting.

Composers' revisions of scores is hardly anything new. One would assume that the final version left by the composer would be the standard version used in performance.

But consider poor Anton Bruckner. Not only did he himself make revisons in several of his symphonies, especially early ones, but there were at least a couple of later guys who took it upon themselves to make revisions also. The result is that various recordings can have complete different movements, depending, they say, on the conductor. And Bruckner was a church organist, even though he seems to have left us little organ music to go by. No Franck or Widor.

Would it be safe to surmise that modern methods of writing and transcribing may make things more permanent for current-day composers?
 
Top