• Welcome to the Pipe Organ Forum! This is a part of the open community Magle International Music Forums focused on pipe organs (also known as "church organs"), organists, organ music and related topics.

    This forum is intended to be a friendly place where technically advanced organists and beginners (or even non-organists) can feel comfortable having discussions and asking questions. We learn by reading and asking questions, and it is hoped that the beginners (or non-organists) will feel free to ask even the simplest questions, and that the more advanced organists will patiently answer these questions. On the other hand, we encourage complex, technical discussions of technique, music, organ-building, etc. The opinions and observations of a diverse group of people from around the world should prove to be interesting and stimulating to all of us.

    As pipe organ discussions can sometimes become lively, it should be pointed out that this is an open forum. Statements made here are the opinion of the poster, and not necessarily that of the forum itself, its administrator, or its moderators.

    In order to post a new topic - or reply to existing ones - you may join and become a member by clicking on Register New User. It's completely free and only requires a working email address (in order to confirm your registration - it will never be given away!). We strive to make this a friendly and informative forum for anyone interested in pipe organs and organ music.

    (Note: If you wish to link to and promote your own website please read this thread first.)

    Many kind regards
    smile.gif

    Frederik Magle
    Administrator

    Krummhorn
    Co-Administrator

A question about the Notre Dame organ

SilverLuna

New member
Hi everyone,
I have a question that I've been pondering for quite a while, but I never got to figure it out...

Quoted from Wikipedia, "Notre Dame de Paris" Section: "The organ":
.......In December 1992, work was completed on the organ that fully computerized the organ under 3 LANs (Local Area Networks).
Ok..... so I know that the latest restoration was in 1990, completed in 1992, but, is it now fully computerized? With the pipes still to fool everyone that it's real? Orr..... is there a plan to take the pipes down sometime? (NOOOOOOOOO D:< Pipe organs 4ever..... yes I guess you'll call me a purest xD) Or can the organ also work with the pipes? I'm confused.. D:

Thanks! Hope to hear an answer!
~Silver
 

Bagnew

New member
My assumption is that the LANs are similar to the tracker/pneumatic/electric action that controls the pipes from the console, but I may be (see: probably am) wrong.
 

Dorsetmike

Member
Hi Silver, a quick Google found this site
http://james.chauveau.free.fr/ND/paris_nd.htm
it would appear that the computerisation is for control, all the pipes are still in use, just the connections from console to the organ have been modernised.

Abort the panic attack
cheerleader.gif
drama.gif
 

SilverLuna

New member
Abort the panic attack
cheerleader.gif
drama.gif

lol!!!! xD whew. There are still pipe organs in this world!!!!!! D: D: D: *winkwink ;)*

So, the sound isn't delayed if it's moderised? Because the pipe organ here is traditional and that sound is delayed becase the air has to travel to the pipes. And thanks for the info!
Contra- Thanks so much!! :eek:
 

Dorsetmike

Member
Not the air, but the connection from the console to the valve that allows the air to the pipe. On older organs this was mechanical, a system of rods and levers, have a look at the connection from a key to its relevant hammer on a piano, then imagine extending that from the few feet or inches in a piano to the distance between the console and the pipes of an organ.

During the 20th century electrical connections began to replace mechanical, now computer technology is being used which needs a lot less wires and operates much faster than previous systems.
 

Analogicus

Member
It's not necessarily the case that "computer technology" leads to faster operation than "previous systems", if by the latter you are referring to previous electronic control systems. If MIDI technology is in use, which is often the case these days, there can be real timing problems with pipe organs (less so with virtual organs, which are instruments where the sounds are being being generated by computer software or hardware). The problem lies in the speed allocated to the MIDI system, which seemed adequate when specified in the early 1980's, and did not have pipe organs in mind where we have multiple manuals and many stops, but the problem can be reduced by careful configuration of the MIDI arrangements.

Analogicus
 

Soubasse

New member
I'm sure I recall a Scientific American article about the computerisation of the Notre Dame action many years ago. But it was highly critical because the organ was essentially unplayable at the time due to one monumental stuff-up after another. Obviously things have improved since then, but it's like the old adage says: "To err is human, to totally screw things up requires a computer."
 

SilverLuna

New member
Really? Because I love to listen to recordings of Widor's symphonies by O. Latry (you can search them up on YT), and I don't know if people are just talking crap or if they might have a point, becase all the comments on the bottom of the Toccata video, people said that this recording was BEFORE the computerization in the 1990s, and at about the end of the Toccata Latry puts it on tutti..... ? Orrrr was there some sort of a prior computerization before the 1990s? And that in the 1990s they wanted it to be more modern?

xD That what ponders me most.
~Silver
 

Thierry59

New member
NDP organ was electrified in 1965-197 by the organmakers Herman and Boisseau (36 adjustable combinations, crescendo pedal, couplers and so on). Due to bad maintenance, the electric parts of the organ have been collapsing and the combinator went down in august 1984 just after Cochereau's death.
Example here of the combinator failure:
Yves Devernay in the late 80's helped by his assistant!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPyrNI_rcQU
 

mathetes1963

New member
What I'd LOVE to see happen @ N-D de P, but likely never will, is for them to totally gut the computers/chamades/added material, and reconstitute the original Cavaille-Coll specification, at least as far as how Vierne knew it. After all, the original console still exists, it could be restored. The excellent playing of Latry notwithstanding, that organ has been pretty much ruined IMHO.

My two shekels' worth ;)
 

Soubasse

New member
Well, that's essentially one of the things pointed out by the aforementioned Sci Am article. The "archaic" mechanical action of an organ such as S. Sulpice really put (and possibly still does) the ND organ and plenty of others in the shade in terms of reliability.
There's no doubting that a player of Latry's calibre can make any instrument sound good, and the many YouTube clips of his playing/improvising are nothing short of stunning. But it's clear that the instrument has been through the ringer in terms of playability.

I keep forgetting, who was the blind organist there? Was it Devernay or Leguay? I only ask because I think it was the "talking" computer that was installed (it called out stop names and things like that) which really started to cause problems.
 

Thierry59

New member
What I'd LOVE to see happen @ N-D de P, but likely never will, is for them to totally gut the computers/chamades/added material, and reconstitute the original Cavaille-Coll specification, at least as far as how Vierne knew it. After all, the original console still exists, it could be restored. The excellent playing of Latry notwithstanding, that organ has been pretty much ruined IMHO.

My two shekels' worth ;)
The organs in general have to fit to musicians aspirations and talents.
Without the restauration Pierre Cochereau would not have been able to express his improvisator genious, nor Latry would have been able to play the more incredible piece for organ composed in the recent times: "Debout sur le soleil" by Jean-Louis Florentz specifically created for NDP and his computerized combinator!
 

dll927

New member
A few comments here:

1. Some animal lover is going to raise a fuss about those 1,000 sheep skins.

2. Louis Vierne was essentially blind.

3 Candle smoke and breathing of all those visitors -- Do they expect a church to remain empty?? As for candle smoke, when they decided to clean up the ceiling of the famed Cistine Chapel, such smoke was blamed for the problem. Do they really need to burn candles in a church??

4. Notre Dame has been tinkered with for several decades now. If St. Sulpice still functions pretty much as it was built, who decided that N. D. needed to be "modernized"??? The other "Michaelangelo" at St.Ouen in Rouen is also supposed to be pretty much still as it was built. Poor old
Aristide must be turning over in his grave over Notre Dame and the many others that have been ruined.
 

Corno Dolce

Admiral Honkenwheezenpooferspieler
If my memory serves me, the offending computer system at Notre Dame de Paris organ was designed, constructed and installed by Synaptel. What a piece of junk........Glory to God it was stripped out - Now things work as they should.
 

dll927

New member
Organs are still being built with mechanical action, at least for the key action if not the stops. Which raises an interesting question: Are there more modern materials and building methods that make an organ easier to play and not in need of constant maintenance and adjustments? We have advanced somewhat since 200-300 years ago, and there are probably improvements (?) in the ways they do things. I'm asking this assuming a mechanical-action organ. But if St. Sulpice still works, who's complaining?
 

Corno Dolce

Admiral Honkenwheezenpooferspieler
St. Sulpice is in a league of its own........N.de P. is of course not the original C-C........I have always fancied what the sound would be like if all the original stops were in place...........?
 
Top