• Welcome to the Pipe Organ Forum! This is a part of the open community Magle International Music Forums focused on pipe organs (also known as "church organs"), organists, organ music and related topics.

    This forum is intended to be a friendly place where technically advanced organists and beginners (or even non-organists) can feel comfortable having discussions and asking questions. We learn by reading and asking questions, and it is hoped that the beginners (or non-organists) will feel free to ask even the simplest questions, and that the more advanced organists will patiently answer these questions. On the other hand, we encourage complex, technical discussions of technique, music, organ-building, etc. The opinions and observations of a diverse group of people from around the world should prove to be interesting and stimulating to all of us.

    As pipe organ discussions can sometimes become lively, it should be pointed out that this is an open forum. Statements made here are the opinion of the poster, and not necessarily that of the forum itself, its administrator, or its moderators.

    In order to post a new topic - or reply to existing ones - you may join and become a member by clicking on Register New User. It's completely free and only requires a working email address (in order to confirm your registration - it will never be given away!). We strive to make this a friendly and informative forum for anyone interested in pipe organs and organ music.

    (Note: If you wish to link to and promote your own website please read this thread first.)

    Many kind regards
    smile.gif

    Frederik Magle
    Administrator

    Krummhorn
    Co-Administrator

Which Publisher's Editions you prefer for Organ pieces?

Contratrombone64

Admiral of Fugues
Depends entirely on the country of the composer really. For Bach I like Barenreiter. For English, Novello. It's a rather open ended question really.
 

jhnbrbr

New member
Years ago I started to learn the Dorian toccata from one edition from the public library and then bought a different edition from the music shop and was horrified to discover some of the notes had "moved". I always feel safe with Widor and Schweitzer as editors, but this is purely a gut feeling.
 

Krummhorn

Administrator
Staff member
ADMINISTRATOR
When I began my organ study, my teacher insisted that I get the Dupré editions. I have those for Bach and Mendelssohn. I also have the Schweitzer editions for a good number of Bach pieces.
 

wljmrbill

Member
I use Widor-Schweitzer and mostly editions from Schrimer's Library of Music Classics. Some of Dr. WIlliam C. Carl"s compiled and edted music, some Gentry and Yunity Mujsic Press.
 

dll927

New member
Somehow this raises a question: why are there differences? If a composer's hand-written (?) versions are used, there should be no problems, unless they were awfully messy in their manuscripts, in which case, how did they expect anyone to follow them?

It might as well be a question of, do you prefer vertical or horizontal orientation on the pages?

I have Shirmer's edition of Franck's three chorales and of Boellmanns"s Gothic Suite. The Franck has three or four places where there are comments about the notes as written being impossible to play. Did Franck do that?

What about poor Anton Bruckner? Not only did he revise some of his symphonies, but there were at least a couple of later "editors" who got involved in making changes. How is a conductor supposed to know what to do?
 
Somehow this raises a question: why are there differences? If a composer's hand-written (?) versions are used, there should be no problems, unless they were awfully messy in their manuscripts, in which case, how did they expect anyone to follow them?

It might as well be a question of, do you prefer vertical or horizontal orientation on the pages?

I have Shirmer's edition of Franck's three chorales and of Boellmanns"s Gothic Suite. The Franck has three or four places where there are comments about the notes as written being impossible to play. Did Franck do that?

What about poor Anton Bruckner? Not only did he revise some of his symphonies, but there were at least a couple of later "editors" who got involved in making changes. How is a conductor supposed to know what to do?

Well, that would raise a good question. I guess, that indeed, that if the manuscripts exist and are intact there should be no problem. But if the manuscript was not written by the composer himself (see the last works of Bach , where he had one of his brothers right for him) and maybe changes have been done, or if the manuscript is unclear, publishers take these manuscripts and decide whats better (for their opinion) to be done.

By the way, personally, i prefer horizontal orientation for organ pieces. But thats personal opinion. My Bach Books are all horizontally oriented, though other more modern pieces are vertically. My Clerambault copies are also vertical.
 

dll927

New member
Widor is a case in point. An organist named John Near did considerable resarch on Widor's "organ symphonies" and, I believe, published an edition of them. Widor himself made revisions and corrections, and there were several versions of some pieces.

But in such a case, one would assume that the final version the composer left would be the standard to go by.

That still doesn't explain why Bruckner had such problems.!!
 

Contratrombone64

Admiral of Fugues
Bruckner's problem was he was never quite happy with his symphonies ... hence a couple of them have three versions. The Romantic has at least three and good luck finding a mini-score that is the same as a recording.
 

dll927

New member
I guess that must be true, but at some point, one has to leave well enough alone!!

BTW, Bruckner was a church organist, but he left very little in the way of organ music. It is said that he is more popular in German-speaking than in English-speaking countries, and his symphonies have been accused of a certain amount of "sameness", but I've also read that some feel there should be a fourth "B" -- Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, and Bruckner.
 
Top