• Welcome to the Pipe Organ Forum! This is a part of the open community Magle International Music Forums focused on pipe organs (also known as "church organs"), organists, organ music and related topics.

    This forum is intended to be a friendly place where technically advanced organists and beginners (or even non-organists) can feel comfortable having discussions and asking questions. We learn by reading and asking questions, and it is hoped that the beginners (or non-organists) will feel free to ask even the simplest questions, and that the more advanced organists will patiently answer these questions. On the other hand, we encourage complex, technical discussions of technique, music, organ-building, etc. The opinions and observations of a diverse group of people from around the world should prove to be interesting and stimulating to all of us.

    As pipe organ discussions can sometimes become lively, it should be pointed out that this is an open forum. Statements made here are the opinion of the poster, and not necessarily that of the forum itself, its administrator, or its moderators.

    In order to post a new topic - or reply to existing ones - you may join and become a member by clicking on Register New User. It's completely free and only requires a working email address (in order to confirm your registration - it will never be given away!). We strive to make this a friendly and informative forum for anyone interested in pipe organs and organ music.

    (Note: If you wish to link to and promote your own website please read this thread first.)

    Many kind regards
    smile.gif

    Frederik Magle
    Administrator

    Krummhorn
    Co-Administrator

Which is your favourite Franck Choral?

Which is your favourite Franck Choral?

  • No 1 in E

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • No 2 in B minor

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • No 3 in A minor

    Votes: 4 33.3%

  • Total voters
    12

wljmrbill

Member
For ease of listening to the adverage listerner I would say definately No 1 in E , for a more professional group I would say the No 3 in a minor. But i also like the b minor too.. hard to really choose..... but No. 1 in E comes on top of my list overall.
 

Krummhorn

Administrator
Staff member
ADMINISTRATOR
I chose No 3 in A minor ... mainly because that's the one I have done in concerts over the years. Always a favorite among my listeners - especially the Adagio, which I have used for offertoire and/or communion during services.

I only wish I had a bit more oomph in my church organ ... but with some imagination and careful registration, it comes out pretty nice on just 9 ranks.
 

jhnbrbr

New member
Thanks for your opinions - it looks pretty even at the moment. There's no doubt each one is quite special - Prof Ian Tracey once said his favourite was whichever one he happened to be playing at the time!

Hi Jean-Paul, yes I listened to your homage when you first posted it. It's an enjoyable work in its own right, and it's quite amazing how the original choral is still present, even though the musical language is completely different. Are your themes derived from Franck's in some way?

Like the string quartet, these amazing works prove Franck was absolutely on top of his game at age 68. If only the old fool had taken a bit more care crossing the road, he might have lived another ten years, and who can say what other priceless gems he might have left us? Still, there's enough to be going on with ...
 
Last edited:

dll927

New member
All three are jewels, but somehow I've long had a special liking for the b-minor. It has sometimes been called "almost a passacaglia" because of all the repetition of that opening pedal theme.

No doubt, the adagio in #3 is about as sublime as anything ever put to paper (or pipes).

I once read someplace that #1 is the longest, #2 is the most difficult, and #3 is the most popular. Who's to say??

It is said that Franck completed the chorales on his deathbed. It probably can't be documented, but surely he must have had some time (before he was hit by the carriage) to try out at least parts of them himself at St. Clotilde. How long were they germinating in his mind?

Franck had something of a penchant for repetition of themes, and not always in just the same formation. Just about anything he wrote shows that. The infamous "Grande Piece Symphonique" ends with just about a recap of everything that went before.

But I digress -- this asked about the chorales!!
 
Last edited:

dll927

New member
Going a bit beyond the chorales, the "Piece Heroique" seems to be considered
Franck's most-played piece. I printed out a PDF of it, and just looking at the pages, it is so full of accidentals that anyone who manages to play it probably deserves a medal. Of course, he was rather fond of sharps, so that helps.

Speaking of the vox humana, I've long been fond of the Fantaisie in A, which ends with a quiet section on said stop (as does the b-minor chorale). Not long ago, there was a You-Tube of Marcel Dupre playing the Fantaisie in A, but so darned slowly that you almost get lost between the notes!!

Franck's "dozen" are all well-deserving of whatever fame they may have. It's a shame that we don't have any recordings of him actually playing them.
 

jhnbrbr

New member
Franck's "dozen" are all well-deserving of whatever fame they may have. It's a shame that we don't have any recordings of him actually playing them.

Earlier this year someone claimed to have discovered a recording by Eddison of Franck playing his "Priere" but it turned out to be an April Fools prank. It's quite possible that we wouldn't think much of his playing today. I remember reading somewhere that he played the organ very rubato, and "rolled" the chords, but then he was a pianist in his young days. I recently came across some recordings of Albert Schweitzer on YT, and even after making allowances for the sound quality, I'm pretty sure Schweitzer would not be considered much of a performer by modern standards.

One puzzling thing about Franck's "Chorals" is the name, which usually implies the use of an existing chorale melody. "Fantasy on an original chorale-like theme" would be more accurate, if a bit long-winded.
 

Soubasse

New member
I've played all three a number of times over the years and speaking personally, I'd have to say the most fun (and the most rewarding) has always been No.3. I agree with dll in that the adagio of the 3rd is one of the most superlative and sublime sections of music ever written. Often in practice, I'll play it incredibly slowly just so I can milk each and every one of those magnificent chord changes underneath (or on top of) that melismatic theme. He was master harmonist for sure as also proven in the final few bars leading to the supremely eargasmic cadence.
 

Krummhorn

Administrator
Staff member
ADMINISTRATOR
The sequence following the adagio (in No 3) where the melody line is intertwined is another favorite part of mine.

I have used No 1's first movement as a prelude on occasion, too ... we don't have a Vox .. so I fake it with the swell celeste ranks coupled to the great 4' Gedeckt with the trem added. We make do with what resources we have sometimes.
 

acc

Member
Like dll927, I love all three but am especially fond of the B minor. Together with the Prière, it is Franck's very heart — at least, that's the way I feel it.
 

Corno Dolce

Admiral Honkenwheezenpooferspieler
Hi there "Organistes et Aficionados",

Just to let you know that all's well with wife and quadruplets :D:D:D:D
Now, the B-minor is my fav by far and I have a soft spot for the "Priere". Franck's plangent pathos and bathos in the B-minor and Priere pierce me to the core - A cri de coeur in other words...

Cheers,

CD :pray:
 

dll927

New member
About performances and recordings -- chances are, it's true that some players of yesteryear might not seem up to today's standards. I have a copy (in English translation) of Schweitzer's autobiography, in which he has a whole chapter devoted to organs and playing. He's somewhat opinionated, but he makes the remark that Bach is "played altogether too fast".

I sometimes wonder if that might not be the key. With modern organs, do many organists tend to play at faster tempi than was once the norm? Moreover, acoustics in a church or hall can make a difference. It would seem that, in a place with a long reverberation, fast tempi, especially with baroque-style music or anything with toccata-like passages would come across as just a lot of noise with little attention to individual 'voices'.

I have a complete set of Beethoven's symphonies done by the Chicago Symphony under Sir George Solti. In the booklet he makes quite a to-do about faster tempi than were once "standard". But supposedly Ludwig left 'metronome markings' for them. If true, why did it take conductors 150 years to discover them? So some of this is a matter of opinion, I suppose.

It seems to be documented that Widor was highly reluctant to do recordings -- partly because of his age by then, and probably also because in those days recording equipment could do little justice to the situation. It seems to have been when "high fidelity" recording came along in the 1950's that the organ suddenly became the test of recording.

All in all, there is probably some truth to the idea that things were different a few generations back.
 

mathetes1963

New member
Speaking of the vox humana, I've long been fond of the Fantaisie in A, which ends with a quiet section on said stop (as does the b-minor chorale). Not long ago, there was a You-Tube of Marcel Dupre playing the Fantaisie in A, but so darned slowly that you almost get lost between the notes!!

Not to mention that Dupre uses the voix celeste instead on that piece. :(
 
Last edited:

mathetes1963

New member
But they are one and the same, surely?

Voix humaine and voix celeste? Not at all. The VH is reed stop bearing a *fancied* resemblance to the human voice; the VC is actually two string ranks tuned wide to create an undulating or "celestial" effect.

So, by changing Franck's registrations, Dupre effectively changes the character of the music.

EDIT:
Know what? I am a LOUSY multi-tasker. I should have said Dupre used the voix celeste instead of the voix humaine...ugh, dain bramage...
 
Last edited:

jhnbrbr

New member
Phew, Mathetes, I thought I was the one going mad till I realised you'd edited the original post! Anyway, fully understand now, and it does seem strange. Perhaps the Voix Humaine was out of tune on that day?

Well, #2 is romping ahead in this poll, but on YT #3 seems the most popular. I really like this version by Michael Murray at St Sernin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehigHG0K1y4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkHS8ttgSH8

Unfortunately, I couldn't find a recording of #2 of similar quality.
 

dll927

New member
Long ago I had a recording (LP) of Dupre playing the Grande Piece Symphonique on that sacrosanct organ. At the part where the slow movement is repeated in the key of C (instead of B!!!), he obviously used the celeste, and it was beautiful, even on such an old, even by then (1950's, I'm sure), instrument. Maybe he was one of these anti-tremolo types and preferred that to the vox. However, it may also be true that 'tremolo' on that organ leaves a bit to be desired. Check with Roth!!
 

acc

Member
Long ago I had a recording (LP) of Dupre playing the Grande Piece Symphonique on that sacrosanct organ. At the part where the slow movement is repeated in the key of C (instead of B!!!), he obviously used the celeste, and it was beautiful, even on such an old, even by then (1950's, I'm sure), instrument. Maybe he was one of these anti-tremolo types and preferred that to the vox.

Maybe, but in the “Grande Pièce Symphonique”, Franck did indicate the Voix céleste in the slow mouvement's repetition (so in this case, there is no reason to wonder why Dupré failed to use the Voix humaine).
 
Top