LOL !
Yes, that's not very far from what evolutionists really believe and teach. It's ridiculous, of course.
1. Science tells us only life brings forth life. The evolutionist flatly disagrees. And yet science, real science, clearly demonstrates this fact without exception.
2. The myth of evolution began in pagan antiquity. The ancient Greeks believed life came first from river mud. From inanimate matter. During the Middle Ages that idea was revived. So it was widely believed an empty barrel would be invaded by mice, etc. That the mice suddenly appeared, spontaneously, from nowhere. This nonsense was finally disproved by science. By a great 19th century non-evolutionist scientist. Louis Pasteur. Today we know that only life can bring forth life. Period.
3. The 'evolutionist' tells us 'species have evolved from other, earlier species'. But if you closely read what Darwin, Lamarck and others wrote they avoided giving any definition of what 'species' actually are. They repeatedly duck this issue. In fact they taught that species can be virtually anything they want them to be ! A flower existing in different forms in two different places can be described as a different species from another, even if, in fact, they are merely two different varieties of the same species ! This happens all the time in evolutionary publications. A fossil in one part of the world is described as a 'previously unknown species' when, in fact, it is merely a different form, a local variety, of a still existing and already known species.
4. The earliest research on species was conducted almost entirely by people who did not believe in 'evolution'. Men such as John Ray, Linnaeus and others were first to classify species. They attempted to define a species as -
'a specific living organism which brings forth only according to its own kind'.
(Which is almost precisely what the bible teaches of 'every seed bringing forth after its own kind').
To be fair, this species definition is not completely perfect. (Few definitions are). But it was good enough for science up until the arrival of modern genetics.
It became clear by about 1900 that the infamous theory of evolution (being taught in universities worldwide) was seriously wrong. In that year 3 different scientists working in different countries all published evidence independently of each other that species were remarkably stable units in living nature. This new science was eventually called 'genetics'. It showed by clear proofs that species are essentially permanent members of living nature. And, although a given species can undergo different bodily changes ('morphological changes') from region to region in response to different environments and living conditions they remain the very same species. These facts are so important they are laws of genetics. So much for the 'evolution of new species' !
This new science of 'genetics' was based on the great earlier research of the non-evolutionary researcher Grigor Mendel. And it was hated from the beginning, by Darwinists, Lamarckians, Lysenko and other sorts of evolutionists - so much that it was officially banned from being taught in the USSR. The biggest critics of modern genetics were evolutionists themselves.
5. The idea the fossil record 'proves evolution' is simply untrue. It does nothing of the kind. Did you ever see an evolutionary book on the (supposed) evolutionary history of the plant kingdom ? They don't exist. In fact the study of fossil plants (palaeontology) shows entire classes of plants appear first in the fossil record as fully formed species. Ferns, oak trees, and countless other plants suddenly appear in the fossil record. That's not 'evolution', is it. So students are not shown such facts. The highly selective proofs of Darwinian teachers is amazing.
The fossils that cause most controversy - human fossils - are always shown out of their true context. For example, some of the most famous human fossils of 'man's ancestors' were found side by side by anatomically 'modern' human fossils which go unmentioned ! For example, at Shanidar in Iraq 'Neanderthal' fossils were found in the 20th century, side by side with modern human fossils. (The modern fossils went without mention in many textbooks). The same is true of 'Neanderthal' fossils found in Israel at Mount Carmel and in many, many, other places. In fact, the earliest graveyards of civilizations such as those of Sumeria, Egypt and other places such as Crete show a high proportion of the skulls of human remains being remarkably like those of 'Neanderthals', these next to skulls from humans that are virtually the same as modern man. The famous 'Lucy' fossil from Africa was found next to the remains of anatomically modern humans. These too go without reference in Darwinian literature.
It is very clear today that many populations of the ancient world (especially those living in lowland areas) were genetically affected by hazardous environments associated with the last global episode of mountain formation. (For many of the great mountain chains of the modern world were formed only very recently. This is known by the sorts of fossils found there at altitudes). The populations of these lower areas seem to have been massively affected by these hazardous environments. The results were mutational forms. These living at the same time as other populations who were less affected. The results in human terms were 'Neanderthals'.
So the 'Neanderthals' were NOT ancestors of modern man. They were actually his contemporaries. And were later integrated in to modern populations, so that 'Neanderthals' as a form virtually disappeared, this within the span of human recorded history.
Darwin was wrong. Man did not evolve from 'primitive' and now extinct species. He was in fact contemporary with all of his supposed 'ancestors'.
Anyway there's lots more that could be said. This is just a brief description of how false 'evolution theory' is and how highly selective its teachers have always been. The evidence from science shows evolution theory (so-called) is moonshine.
Regards