Robert Newman
Banned
The Supremacy of the U.S. Constitution in the USA.
Q. Can new laws ever replace, even temporarily, the rights and obligations found in the US Constitution ? (Such as being told martial law is now in place and that the rights and provisions of the US Constitution are no longer valid ?).
A. No. According to a verdict on this very question given by the US Supreme Court itself NO law, even law passed in a time of civil unrest, or in time of war or in a state of emergency, can ever be superior or described as a substitute for the rights and privileges of the US Constitution in the USA. Any law, laws or Act (such as the notorious ‘Patriot Act’) passed by politicians is legally inferior to the rights and provisions of the U.S. Constitution itself which are permanent. Here’s a clear statement to that effect given as long ago as 1866 by the U.S. Supreme Court which settles this question once and for all -
‘The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people equally in war and in peace and it covers with the shield of its protection ALL classes of men AT ALL TIMES and UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that the provisions of the United States Constitution can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government’.
(Ex parte Milligan 71 - Verdict of US Supreme Court (2) of 1866).
Crystal clear proof. A verdict given by the highest legal authority of the USA that the great Constitution of the USA is the supreme law and embodiment of rights in the USA. Always. Regardless of what corrupt politicians or others may think about it. The US Constitution cannot be suspended, ever. And those who believe or say otherwise are plain wrong.
And here's a statement made in 2003 by US Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney of Georgia after the shameful passing of the 'Patriot Act' -
'It appears to me that the American people might have a criminal syndicate running their government'.
//
Q. Can new laws ever replace, even temporarily, the rights and obligations found in the US Constitution ? (Such as being told martial law is now in place and that the rights and provisions of the US Constitution are no longer valid ?).
A. No. According to a verdict on this very question given by the US Supreme Court itself NO law, even law passed in a time of civil unrest, or in time of war or in a state of emergency, can ever be superior or described as a substitute for the rights and privileges of the US Constitution in the USA. Any law, laws or Act (such as the notorious ‘Patriot Act’) passed by politicians is legally inferior to the rights and provisions of the U.S. Constitution itself which are permanent. Here’s a clear statement to that effect given as long ago as 1866 by the U.S. Supreme Court which settles this question once and for all -
‘The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people equally in war and in peace and it covers with the shield of its protection ALL classes of men AT ALL TIMES and UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that the provisions of the United States Constitution can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government’.
(Ex parte Milligan 71 - Verdict of US Supreme Court (2) of 1866).
Crystal clear proof. A verdict given by the highest legal authority of the USA that the great Constitution of the USA is the supreme law and embodiment of rights in the USA. Always. Regardless of what corrupt politicians or others may think about it. The US Constitution cannot be suspended, ever. And those who believe or say otherwise are plain wrong.
And here's a statement made in 2003 by US Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney of Georgia after the shameful passing of the 'Patriot Act' -
'It appears to me that the American people might have a criminal syndicate running their government'.
//
Last edited: